<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Norway’s New Focus: Water</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oxfordswfproject.com/2009/08/17/norway%e2%80%99s-new-focus-water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oxfordswfproject.com/2009/08/17/norway%e2%80%99s-new-focus-water/</link>
	<description>The Design and Governance of Sovereign Wealth Funds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:54:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CIC Going Green? &#171; Oxford SWF Project</title>
		<link>http://oxfordswfproject.com/2009/08/17/norway%e2%80%99s-new-focus-water/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CIC Going Green? &#171; Oxford SWF Project]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oxfordswfproject.com/?p=2666#comment-840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up? Is the CIC following Norway&#8217;s lead and adding environmental investing to its remit? I don&#8217;t think so. For a company that has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up? Is the CIC following Norway&#8217;s lead and adding environmental investing to its remit? I don&#8217;t think so. For a company that has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vision Offers Alternative Perspective &#171; Oxford SWF Project</title>
		<link>http://oxfordswfproject.com/2009/08/17/norway%e2%80%99s-new-focus-water/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vision Offers Alternative Perspective &#171; Oxford SWF Project]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oxfordswfproject.com/?p=2666#comment-427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] SWFs should waive their rights to vote their shares and accept directorships. After reading about Norway&#8217;s recent expansion of its active investor program, I think this is a fair [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SWFs should waive their rights to vote their shares and accept directorships. After reading about Norway&#8217;s recent expansion of its active investor program, I think this is a fair [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashby Monk</title>
		<link>http://oxfordswfproject.com/2009/08/17/norway%e2%80%99s-new-focus-water/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashby Monk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oxfordswfproject.com/?p=2666#comment-415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, GPF-G&#039;s policy kind of reminds me of CalPERS activist approach. I guess if you own 1% of the global stock market, you have the capacity to make change on various levels. Thanks for the comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, GPF-G&#8217;s policy kind of reminds me of CalPERS activist approach. I guess if you own 1% of the global stock market, you have the capacity to make change on various levels. Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rien huizer</title>
		<link>http://oxfordswfproject.com/2009/08/17/norway%e2%80%99s-new-focus-water/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rien huizer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oxfordswfproject.com/?p=2666#comment-414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noble and intriguing. The economic rationale seems a bit farfetched though. Though it does not look like Norway is going to sell all of its stock in sinners, just vote. Since it will always be a minority shareholder, that vote is unlikely to change anything. Also, should the economic rationale hold, it will only do so in the long term. Small stakes allow a relatively opportunistic exist and, in a way an opportunity to a sort of free ride: others with less mobile stakes will have less opportunity to exit opportunistically. Noble and still efficient. Clever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noble and intriguing. The economic rationale seems a bit farfetched though. Though it does not look like Norway is going to sell all of its stock in sinners, just vote. Since it will always be a minority shareholder, that vote is unlikely to change anything. Also, should the economic rationale hold, it will only do so in the long term. Small stakes allow a relatively opportunistic exist and, in a way an opportunity to a sort of free ride: others with less mobile stakes will have less opportunity to exit opportunistically. Noble and still efficient. Clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

