Posts Tagged 'Russia'

The Kremlin as a Co-Investor

Ashby Monk

If you were looking to partner with someone for private equity investments in Russia, who would be the top of your list? Any quick thoughts?

Well, if you said, “The Kremlin” then you chose wisely. What’s that? Why do you need the Kremlin on your side? Well how’s about we ask Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for some insights on the matter:

“I have already given my opinion on the investment climate in this country — it is very bad … Corruption remains a factor.”

OK. So the investment climate remains dire. What to do? It may seem a bit obvious, but how about finding a way for private equity investors to actually partner with the Kremlin as a co-investor.

Brilliant idea. Sold. Called the Russian Direct-Investment Fund, the Kremlin hopes that its $10 billion investment will attract upwards of $90 billion in foreign investment over the next five years. And, significantly, it appears the co-investment idea is having the intended effect, as the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, China Investment Corporation, Kuwait Investment Authority and Korea Investment Corporation have all apparently been to Moscow in the past two weeks to meet with Vladimir Putin and talk about participating in the new SWF.

And why are these funds interested? According to one source from a SWF interested in investing in the RDIF:

“We perceive there will be no guarantee, but we expect there will be strong support on many areas by the Russian government…”

Put simply, the impetus for the new sovereign fund is to assuage the fears of foreign investors by creating a government-backed vehicle that they can participate in. For example, the CIC’s Lou Jiwei has reportedly said that the RDIF offers rich investment opportunities. He has also said that Chinese investors and companies should seek to cooperate with Russian governmental institutions to overcome the risks of investing in Russia:

“The Direct Investments Fund could be a flexible way to attract foreign investment, which can help overseas investors to work together with the Russian government, to find and assess the projects they need in Russia.”

So the backing of the Kremlin is probably the driving factor here, as individuals who might otherwise engage in corrupt practices with private investors wouldn’t dare mess around when the Kremlin is a co-investor.

Still, that’s not to say there aren’t other factors attracting these investors to the RDIF. For example, the new SWF will be headed up by a very talented fund manager: Kirill Dmitriev, founder and Managing Partner of Icon Private Equity. Mr. Dmitriev has a long track-record of successful private equity investing in Russia. From 2005-2006, he served as the Chairman of the Russian Venture Capital and Private Equity Association. In addition, he has also done time at Goldman and McKinsey as well as attending Stanford and Harvard. Basically he’s got the pedigree that institutional investors love. No doubt he’s an appealing part of the RDIF value proposition.

Medvedev Fights to Keep the ‘R’ in ‘BRICs’

Ashby Monk

Russia is a hard place for foreign investors to operate. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev recently summed up the situation succinctly:

“I have already given my opinion on the investment climate in this country — it is very bad … Corruption remains a factor.”

Indeed. According to PWC’s 2010 ‘Doing Business and Investing in the Russian Federation’,

“…the operating environment remains hazardous on a number of fronts, with many foreign investors scared off by poor legal safeguards.”

So what to do? How can foreign investors be convinced to come back? Seriously, put yourself in Medvedev’s place. How would you go about convincing foreign investors to come back to Russia and make private equity investments?

Interestingly, Medvedev has some new and innovative answers to that question. And the cornerstone of his ‘investment attraction policy’ is a new government investment vehicle that will allow private equity funds to partner with the government in Russian investments. The new fund will be called the Russian Direct-Investment Fund, and the Kremlin hopes it will attract upwards of $90 billion in foreign investment over the next five years.

I’m sure some of you responded to the question above (how to attract foreign investors) by shrinking the imprint of Russia’s government on the Russian economy, and/or by limiting the influence of the government. But Medvedev’s plan to create a new government-backed investment vehicle (i.e., temporarily increasing the scope of the government’s involvement in the private sector) is actually pretty smart, as it will ultimately align the interests of the public and private sectors and provide confidence to the private co-investors that corruption or government interference won’t get in the way of returns. According to Vladimir Dmitriev, who is head of the state bank tasked with setting up the new investment vehicle,

“Investors are simply scared…Investors are ready to come only on [the] condition the government shares the risks with them.”

Put simply, the impetus for the new sovereign fund is to assuage the fears of foreign investors by creating a government-backed vehicle that they can participate in. The subtle sales pitch in this is to say that the individuals who might otherwise engage in corrupt practices with private investors wouldn’t dare mess around with the Kremlin. Creative.

Now, as you know, Russia already has two other sovereign funds: the Reserve Fund and the National Welfare Fund (which are both descendents of the Stabilization Fund, which was split up in 2008). But RDIF will operate quite differently:

“Unlike a traditional sovereign-wealth fund, which usually invests outside its home country, the new fund will put its capital into projects inside Russia. Foreign partners—big international private-equity and sovereign-wealth funds—will be offered the chance to take stakes alongside it, but won’t hold shares in the fund itself… The fund will take stakes of 15% to 25% in each project, spending between $50 million and $500 million…The bulk of the investment in the projects—including controlling stakes—will come from the foreign partners. Typical for private equity, the fund and its partners will hold stakes for five to seven years, exiting through public offerings or other sales… Returns of about 20% are expected over a five- to seven-year investment plan…The fund’s management will be independent, made up of professionals from the industry to allay any fears of political influence or conflicts of interest.”

What’s more, Medvedev only views Russia’s participation in the fund’s investments as temporary:

“The state must not take part in the management of such a fund and must necessarily guarantee withdrawal from the company’s capital in about seven or eight years…The fund will be managed by a team of investment market professionals.”

So the fund is really just a private investment catalyst rather than a long-term investment vehicle for the sovereign’s wealth. Again, that’s quite creative.

Still, it will be very interesting to see how foreign investors react. To date, some funds have already expressed interest, including sovereign funds from China and Abu Dhabi. And it’s not hard to see why: If I were looking for a partner for private equity investments in Russia, the Kremlin would be top of my list.

Joint India-Venezuela SWF Rejected

Ashby Monk

Back in May, I reported that Venezuela wanted to partner with India in a $100 billion SWF to jointly acquire energy assets in Latin America. It was an audacious idea on the part of the Chavez, which, oddly enough, India actually took pretty seriously:

“‘India has asked for a draft of the proposal. It will be discussed with concerned ministries and companies dealing in energy sector,’ said an external affairs ministry official, requesting anonymity.”

Unfortunately for those hoping to see the world’s first overtly strategic bi-lateral SWF, there’s news out this morning that India has formally rejected Venezuela’s offer. It was fun while it lasted.

Why did India take a pass on this opportunity? Not for the reasons you are probably thinking. Here’s the same “external affairs ministry official” from before:

“Given the political risks in Venezuela, it will be advisable to take a consortium financing and energy assets development with China and Russian firms to spread political risks…”

So, if I’m reading this correctly, India has decided to press ahead with strategic energy investing in Latin America, but it just views Russia and China as more reliable business partners than Venezuela. I’ll let you noodle on that one for a while…

China’s Resource Rush: By All Means

Ashby Monk

China hasn’t lost its voracious appetite for resources. In fact, it seems to be increasingly using its foreign exchange reserves to make resource investments in order to meet the country’s strategic needs. However, beyond the recent SWF investments, it looks like SAFE and the State Council have been getting pretty creative in their rush to secure resources.

Indeed, a report out over the weekend in New Century magazine (and reprinted here) indicates that China has been considering a new policy of loaning out its foreign exchange reserves to resource rich countries in exchange for crude oil imports:

“…the idea originated in late-2009 after China signed a deal with Russia under which China would lend $25 billion to Russia in return for 15 million tonnes of crude oil imports…The State Administration of Foreign Exchange has been assigned by the State Council to lead the study into the lending project and SAFE has hired China Development Bank to arrange the loan.”

This is pretty interesting. We don’t have much in the way of details, but we can make some guesses.

First, this seems to imply that China is outsourcing “reserve hoarding” to other countries for a fee. In other words, you come to China, pay a fee, and you’ve got a ready-made SWF (…or at least you have the capital to start one…).

Second, this type of “forex loan” kind of reminds me of “securities lending” within other large institutional investors (such as pension funds). This is where the fund makes short- to medium-term loans of their securities to other investors — who typically want the security to short it — in order to generate incremental revenues from their portfolios. Typically, there is a fee quoted as a percentage of the value of the loaned securities. However, in the Chinese case, the securities lending agreement appears to be priced in barrels of crude instead of cash.

I would love to see more details on this! Very interesting developments…

Russia’s Wealth: Weapon of Economic Destruction?

Ashby Monk

Bloomberg has an astounding article out today that, if true, suggests that Russia was plotting “economic disruptions” against the US in 2008. According to the article, which I have to admit is a bit confusing, former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson discovered a plot by the Russian government to convince the Chinese to sell US agency debt en masse to force a major US government bailout. The plot was discovered by Paulson during his trip to the 2008 Olympics:

“Russia urged China to dump its Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds in 2008 in a bid to force a bailout of the largest U.S. mortgage-finance companies…The Russians made a ‘top-level approach’ to the Chinese ‘that together they might sell big chunks of their GSE holdings to force the U.S. to use its emergency authorities to prop up these companies’…”

The Chinese rejected the idea, and the Russians are, obviously, denying that any of this occurred. Still, Paulson’s report is pretty amazing. If true, it would appear that Russia was plotting economic warfare against the US during the summer of 2008; I don’t really know what else to call it. Their intention was to use their sovereign wealth to purposely weaken and damage the US economy. The fact that all this apparently occurred around the same time that Russia was engaged in a traditional war with Georgia, a US ally, lends some credibility to the idea.

This revelation–while unconfirmed–will not comfort those in the West that fear SWFs; it doesn’t help anybody if these funds are seen to be potential weapons of economic destruction…

Russia’s Rough Patch

Ashby Monk

Russia’s SWFs have been going through a rough patch; facing both financial and political troubles as of late:

Financial: It was reported that the country’s two SWFs saw their combined assets drop by $15.9 billion in December; apparently the government still depends on these funds to fill spending gaps:

“The Reserve Fund fell to $60.5 billion from $75.1 billion at the end of December, while the National Welfare Fund decreased to $91.6 billion from $92.9 billion.”

It was also reported this week that the Reserve Fund saw its assets drop by $75 billion (!) in 2009. Ouch.

Political: And when times are tough, there is always the threat of politicized investing. According to the Moscow Times, money from the National Welfare Fund will be used to finance Vneshekonombank’s (VEB) infrastructure projects. This is an odd development, as the National Welfare Fund was created to prop up the pension system (not prop up state owned enterprises). Indeed, this would be the first time the NWF would be used in this manner.

While the Ministry sees this as a profitable investment, a former Finance Ministry official says that the motivation is not commercial:

“The decision to place a part of the National Welfare Fund money with VEB is undoubtedly political, which means VEB needs the money for something.”

Apparently, VEB has been complaining about a lack of resources for some time, and this is a way for the government to get capital to its cash starved firm. Indeed, one critic said simply that this was a direct way to support a state corporation at taxpayers’ expense.

Rough times for Russia’s SWFs…

Golden Opportunity in Russia?

Ashby Monk

Can you think of a country more reliant on their sovereign wealth right now than Russia? I can’t.

In September, the Russian government spent over $10 billion directly out of its SWF to fill budget gaps. Moreover, the government expects to completely exhaust the SWF by the end of 2010; this is remarkable since the fund is currently valued above $70 billion. Once the SWF is gone, what will the country do?

Apparently, it will sell its gold reserves. The country has roughly $19 billion in gold reserves thanks to current elevated prices. These may be called on to fill budget gaps beyond 2010.

By spending down in this manner, the government seems to be making a big bet that the global economy will be back on its feet by 2011 and government coffers will start filling up again. If not, there will be some tough choices to make.

Russia’s Disappearing SWF – Part 2

Ashby Monk

I mentioned in a previous post that Russia’s poor economic conditions may result in the country’s SWFs being completely tapped out by 2012/13. It looks like I may have been wrong; the Reserve Fund will likely not survive that long.

According to Russian Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin on Wednesday, the Reserve Fund will be “practically exhausted” in 2010, and the government will have to cut spending in order to minimize their budget deficit, which is estimated at 7.4 percent this year.  

Russia has two SWFs–the Reserve Fund and the National Welfare Fund–so it has plenty of assets on hand to finance the budget deficits. At last count, the combined assets under management was over $200 billion dollars. However, given that the Reserve Fund is the larger of the two SWFs, the idea that it could be fully exhausted by next year is remarkable.

It looks like Russia will be heading back into international debt markets…

Russia’s Disappearing SWF

Ashby Monk

Russia may be forced to return to international debt markets for the first time in a decade, according to Catherine Belton of the FT, in order to meet looming budget deficits. This of course implies that the massive reserves that Russia built up over the past decade will be tapped out:

“…it lost one third of reserves, or $200bn, battling a run on the rouble at the end of last year, while the remaining $384bn could be stretched covering budget deficits for the next three years.”

By implication, this means that Russia’s National Welfare Fund may–at least temporarily–cease to exist in 2012/13. It simply will not have any assets left to manage!

SWFs to the rescue…

Ashby Monk

…of their sponsors.

Gleb Bryanski and Yelena Fabrichnaya report that Russia will be tapping its Reserve Fund to fill a budget gap of roughly $75 billion, which represents a draw down of 55% of the SWF’s assets. One more year of budget shortfalls and the Reserve Fund could simply disappear.

In most cases, SWFs were set up with a view towards providing governments with much needed capital during a crisis. Whether it is providing capital to fill a yawning unfunded pension liability or offering a stabilizing influence in economies that are overly reliant on volatile commodity prices, all are in some way ‘insurers of last resort’. This has become all too clear during the current economic crisis. As I said the other day, SWF assets will be used by sponsors around the world for the next few years, bringing the assets under management well below current levels.

However, if these funds succeed in staving off economic meltdown, expect resurgence for SWFs coming out of the crisis…much the way forex reserves grew coming out of the ’97 financial crisis.


About

This website is a project of Professor Gordon L. Clark and Dr. Ashby Monk of the School of Geography and the Environment at the University of Oxford. Their research on sovereign wealth funds is funded by the Leverhulme Trust and The Rotman International Centre for Pension Management.

RSS Feed

 RSS

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 327 other followers

Latest SWF News

Visitors Since August 2010


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 327 other followers